SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2025
Intraperitoneal local anesthetics for postoperative pain management following intra-abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of port-site and intraperitoneal local anesthetic injection versus placebo on postoperative pain and recovery after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Combined Local Anesthetic Infiltration Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postcesarean Analgesia: A Pilot Randomized Double-Blind Trial.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Quality of recovery following intraperitoneal bupivacaine with and without dexamethasone in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine vs magnesium sulfate on early postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized clinical trial.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceAlthough intraperitoneal local anesthetics are commonly used following intra-abdominal surgical procedures, the level of evidence supporting their use for postoperative pain management remains uncertain.
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of intraperitoneal local anesthetics on postoperative pain following intra-abdominal surgery. DATA SOURCES: Medline (PubMed), Embase (Embase.com), CENTRAL, Web of science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from their inception to July 15th, 2022. TRIAL SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials comparing IPLA to placebo, usual care or other analgesic regimens among patients of any age undergoing any type of surgery. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Trial selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and the certainty of evidence were conducted in duplicate independently. Meta-analyses were performed using random effect models. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The co-primary outcomes were abdominal pain intensity at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative nausea and vomiting, opioid use, recovery of gastrointestinal transit, length of hospital stay, postoperative chronic pain, persistent postoperative opioid use, quality of recovery and adverse events.
resultsA total of 150 trials (n = 11,821 participants were included in our systematic review (97% of trials among adults). Intraperitoneal local anesthetics reduced postoperative pain intensity at 6 h (-0.86 point [95%CI -1.02 to -0.70]), 12 h (-0.74 point [95%CI -0.93 to -0.55]), 24 h (-0.65 point [95%CI -0.82 to -0.48]), and 48 h (-0.51 point [95%CI -0.70 to -0.31]), but not at 72 h (-0.38 point [95%CI -1.04 to 0.27]), with very low to low certainty of evidence. Modelled risk difference for achieving the clinically important effect and subgroup analyses among participants with moderate or high pain showed potential clinically significant effect from IPLA. Opioid use at 24 h (-10.4 mg of oral morphine equivalent [95% CI -13.1 to -7.6]), postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.79 [95% CI -0.71 to 0.88]), and time to gastrointestinal transit recovery (-3.80 h [95% CI -7.54 to -0.07]) were also reduced. We found no association for other outcomes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Intraperitoneal local anesthetics may be associated with a small analgesic effect following intra-abdominal surgery. Considering the low to very low level of evidence supporting these findings, along with the limited data on adverse effects and long-term outcomes, their adoption as a standard of care intervention cannot be recommended at this stage. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018115062.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.