ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Birthing partners - validation of a questionnaire to assess the well-being of support persons.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is little research on the well-being of the persons giving support during childbirth and how they feel when doing this. The aim of this study is to validate a questionnaire that assesses the well-being of those support persons during childbirth. This publication focuses on the validation of the questionnaire; the development is described in more detail in a previous publication.
methodsAfter the questionnaire had been developed, it was sent online to a sample for validation. Subsequently, the internal consistency was determined to assess the reliability and the correlation with an external criterion in order to assess the criterion validity. Known-groups validation was used to assess the construct validity of the questionnaire. Linear regressions were carried out to analyse which variables influence well-being.
resultsThe results show good reliability and high criterion validity. The known-groups analyses identified group differences between the different birth modes regarding the different domains of well-being of the support persons. Factors influencing well-being are whether it is a first time or repeated support, whether the birthing woman is a primiparous or multiparous woman and whether the birth is vaginal or operative.
conclusionOur results suggest that this questionnaire adequately captures important aspects of the well-being of support persons during childbirth. The questionnaire is designed for all birth experiences. In the case of negative experience it can be used to assess additional support and counselling and thus potentially promote the mental health of the support persons preventively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.