ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Development of planning of the integrated care for older people in China: a theory of change approach.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and progress of validation studies on the ICOPE scale: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntegrated Care for Older People (ICOPE), developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) with a global perspective, faces varying degrees of barriers to implementation, particularly in middle-and low-income countries. Therefore, as with other new public service interventions, we draw on established integrated care interventions to design a Theory of Change (ToC) model for ICOPE, and to propose methods and pathways for adapting community-based integrated care models for older people (OP) to specific contexts, thereby updating and enhancing the implementation of ICOPE.
methodsAn initial ToC for the ICOPE was drafted based on the WHO guidelines and published literature, and synthesizing the results of semi-structured interviews, group discussions. A total of 36 healthcare stakeholder experts in geriatric nursing, geriatric care and chronic disease management, rehabilitation and quality of life, and psychiatric-mental health were recruited to participate in a 5-stage ToC group workshop conducted consecutively. Each workshop has 2-3 facilitators, and lasts from 60 to 120 min. In multiple workshops, the experts discussed the causal pathway, the interventions needed to activate it, the underlying principles and assumptions, evaluated and refined them, and finally reached consensus.
resultsThe ToC design has improved the ICOPE program, identifying the resources, long-term outcomes, and impacts required for the implementation of ICOPE in a specific setting, and clarifying the specific components of the integrated care interventions, such as materials, procedures, and intervention providers. The localized, OP-centred model of integrated home care developed in our study may contribute to healthy ageing through four potential long-term outcomes: (1) reduction of unnecessary hospitalizations and increased utilization of referral services, (2) enhancement of self-care capacity to prevent, reverse, or delay the decline of intrinsic capacity in OP, (3) improvement of the quality of life of OP living at home, and (4) reduction of caregiving burdens and improvement in the level of caregiving.
conclusionThe ToC is effective in identifying key characteristics of resources, interventions, impact, and outcomes of integrated care for OP. Our ICOPE program has been strengthened by ToC, which forms an integrated care model for assessment, planning, implementation, and evaluation, adapted to a specific setting, and provides guidance for other areas in similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.