ArticlePituitary2025
Estimation of the biological variation of IGF-I in multimorbid geriatric patients and its clinical implications.
Article in Pituitary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIGF-I is a well-established biomarker for detecting abnormalities in the growth hormone axis and evaluating effectiveness of growth hormone (GH) treatment. Common age-related diseases, such as sarcopenia are associated with impairments in the GH axis, making targeted GH therapy a potential treatment option. Nonetheless, data on the biological variation of IGF-I in older patients are missing, potentially leading to inaccurate interpretation of IGF-I concentrations in the diagnostic and therapeutic process. Our study aims to address this gap.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of IGF-I concentrations measured in samples from the geriatric outpatient facility of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich and the respective patient data from the MUnich SArcopenia Registry (MUSAR). Using a mixed-effects model, we estimated the intraindividual biological coefficient of variation (CVi). We calculated the Reference Change Values (RCV) and the Index of Individuality (II).
results246 serum samples from 89 patients (mean age 83 years, range 70-97) were analyzed. The CV
conclusionThe CV
Indexed as
Identifiers
40348938What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.