ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Relapse risk after rituximab discontinuation in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the association between rituximab (RTX) treatment duration and relapse risk, and explore clinical outcomes following treatment discontinuation in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).
methodsWe retrospectively collected data from rituximab-treated patients (>1-year follow-up after treatment initiation) with NMOSD at five major clinical centers in China between 2016 and 2023. The main outcome measures were changes in relapse risk based on the RTX treatment duration and clinical outcomes following relapse after RTX discontinuation. The Andersen-Gill model was used to analyze treatment duration-relapse risk associations.
resultsIn total, 106 rituximab-treated patients were included (40 patients discontinued and 66 continued RTX). Longer RTX treatment significantly reduced relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR]=0.43, P < 0.001). Among 28 patients who discontinued RTX and were followed-up for >1 year after drug withdrawal, 53.6% (15/28) relapsed at a median interval of 14 months. Patients with >2 years of RTX treatment exhibited lower annual relapse rate (ARR) (mean ARR: 0.97 vs. 0.28, P = 0.020) and less severe relapses (mean ΔEDSS score: 1.42 vs. 0.50, P = 0.021) after discontinuation, compared to pre-treatment levels. Only one of four (25%) longer-treated and clinically stable patients (≥2 years of RTX treatment and no relapses ≥2 years before discontinuation) experienced a non-severe relapse by 50 months. Patients aged >55 years in the discontinuation group had the lowest post-discontinuation relapse rate.
interpretationRTX treatment duration strongly correlated with reduced relapse risk in NMOSD patients. Relapse risk after RTX discontinuation was lower than that after discontinuing traditional oral immunosuppressants, particularly in patients with longer treatment and clinical stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40348903What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.