Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2025
Effect of Music Intervention on Pain and Anxiety During Urodynamic Testing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Acupressure on Anxiety, Embarrassment, and Procedural Fear in Patients Undergoing Urodynamic Testing: Randomized Controlled Study.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Trial
- Interventions to decrease pain and anxiety in patients undergoing urodynamic study: Is there any clear evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Arab journal of urology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisUrodynamic testing is used to evaluate urinary tract function and often causes patients to experience pain, anxiety, and embarrassment. Music intervention has been proposed as a strategy to alleviate these discomforts. This research was conducted to investigate the effects of music intervention on pain and anxiety levels in women during urodynamic testing compared to the standard protocol.
methodsDuring December 2021 to October 2022, 50 patients attending the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery clinic at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, that required urodynamic tests were randomized into the music intervention group and the control group (non-music). All participants were given questionnaires including demographic characteristics, pain score (Visual Analog Scale (VAS)), Thai-version State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form (STAI) X-q by Spielberger, the embarrassment level and satisfaction score.
resultsThe median pain level with IQR (interquartile range) demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the two groups (2.50 (4.55) in the music group vs. 0.15 (2.18) in the non-music group, p = 0.064). There were no statistically significant differences in the mean total STAI score (41.07 ± 9.16 in the music group vs. 43.08 ± 7.96 in the non-music group, p = 0.415) and the median VAS of embarrassment score (4.05 (7.32) in the music group vs. 5.00 (6.20) in the non-music group, p = 0.646). There were no statistically significant differences in the satisfaction of both groups.
conclusionThere is no difference in the pain and anxiety in patients undergoing multichannel urodynamic testing with or without music intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40348860What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.