ArticleScientific reports2025
Life cycle assessment of glass fibre versus flax fibre reinforced composite ship hulls.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polylactic Acid Composites: 3D Printing, Life Cycle Assessment, and Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted between a recreational ship hull made of flax fibre-reinforced bio-based epoxy resin and a traditional ship hull made of glass fibre-reinforced polyester. Since small fibreglass boats pose an environmental problem after the end of life (EoL), the primary aim of this study was to evaluate the sustainability of the biocomposite material and identify recommendations for the future eco-design of recreational boats. The LCA study was developed according to the ISO 14,040 (ISO 14040, 2006), 14,044 (ISO 14044, 2006) methodology and the OpenLCA 2.0.4 software with the Ecoinvent v.3.9.1 database. Compared to the traditional one, the LCA of the biocomposite ship hull showed positive environmental impacts for all indicators except Terrestrial Ecotoxicity (TETP), which increased by 357% due to the use of fertilisers in flax production. Remarkably, the Global Warning Potential (GWP) decreased by 14%, the Human Toxicity Potential (HTP) diminished by 13%, and the Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) related to material resources was reduced by 75%. The sensitivity analysis shows that electricity consumption is the primary environmental impact driver for the FFRB ship hull. Thus, selecting renewable energy sources, such as solar or wind power, can significantly enhance sustainability. It is important to note that these impacts are influenced by the system and boundary conditions considered in the study. It was suggested that the local production of flax fibre and the use of recyclable bio-resin could improve the eco-design of the ship hull.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.