ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating seasonal dynamics and human impact on microbial biomass carbon across deep soil profiles in tropical Sal forest of Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve, India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress-resilient endospore-forming diazotrophs from red lateritic soils of India: functional profiling and first evidence of Priestia abyssalis and Bacillus gaemokensis as nitrogen-fixers with multifunctional PGPR traits.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Soil microbial biomass in tropical coastal shelterbelts of Hainan Island: seasonal characteristics and responses to environmental factors.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forest soil is crucial in climate change mitigation, food security, and biogeochemical nutrient cycling. Mixed Sal forests enhance soil organic matter, improve nutrient availability, and regulate pH dynamics. However, anthropogenic disturbances, including deforestation and land-use changes, significantly alter forest cover, leading to shifts in soil physicochemical and microbial properties. These impacts necessitate rigorous monitoring and comprehensive assessment. Therefore, we investigated the effects of contrasting conditions- closed (no human activities) and open (human interferences) mixed Sal Forest on the vertical and seasonal dynamics of microbial biomass carbon (SMBC). Results revealed that the closed mixed Sal Forest had significantly higher SMBC than the open mixed Sal Forest across the soil profile (D1-D5) with a strong seasonal effect. Closed mixed Sal Forest had 60% higher SMBC in D1 than open mixed Sal Forest while it reduced with depth and 17.1 to 56.7% higher SMBC in the subsurface to bottom-most soil profile (D2-D5). Moreover, SMBC was higher in the monsoon period in both forests. The SMBC reduced by 24.2 to 45.1% in the post-monsoon period while reduction was more intense in the pre-monsoon period (48.1 to 68.2%) compared to the monsoon period under closed mixed Sal Forest. Similarly, the decline was more intense in the open mixed Sal Forest, where SMBC declined 12.1 to 54% in the post-monsoon period and 56.1 to 76.2% in the pre-monsoon period compared to the monsoon period. The study indicates that human interference in mixed Sal forests leads to loss of forest cover, negatively affecting microbiological properties and reducing soil fertility, which weakens the forest's resilience to climate change. Additionally, SMBC exhibits seasonal variations, reflecting responses to environmental conditions. These results underline the need to reduce human disturbances and enhance forest conservation strategies to ensure soil sustainability and ecosystem stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.