Trial reportScientific reports2025
Randomized multicenter trial comparing minocycline and ornidazole with classical quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori treatment.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Quadruple Therapy With Semisynthetic Tetracycline for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of antibiotic regimens forFrontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Minocycline-Containing Bismuth Quadruple Therapies Versus Standard First-Line Bismuth Quadruple Therapies forInfectious disease reports · 2026Review
- Minocycline-containing therapy inTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic advances and future directions inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and cost of minocycline, ornidazole, esomeprazole, and bismuth (MOEB) therapy versus classical therapy (amoxicillin, clarithromycin, esomeprazole, and bismuth potassium citrate, ACEB) for Helicobacter pylori eradication. In a randomized trial of 390 patients, MOEB demonstrated superior eradication rates (93.2% per-protocol, 78.5% intention-to-treat) compared to ACEB (82.5% per-protocol, 72.8% intention-to-treat). Adverse events were significantly lower with MOEB (19.3% vs. 33.8%, p = 0.0019). MOEB was also more cost-effective, with a direct cost of 675.7 CNY versus 970.1 CNY for ACEB, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -27.5 CNY per eradication rate. MOEB is a safe, effective, and cost-efficient first-line regimen for H. pylori eradication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.