Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40348792›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Female levator ani muscle damage assessment in supine and upright position.

Irina de Alba Alvarez, Annemarie van der Steen, Anique T M Grob, Frieda van den Noort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irina de Alba AlvarezMulti Modality Medical Imaging (M3I), TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands. irimitra@gmail.com.
Annemarie van der SteenMulti Modality Medical Imaging (M3I), TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Anique T M GrobMulti Modality Medical Imaging (M3I), TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Frieda van den NoortMulti Modality Medical Imaging (M3I), TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek FIT-UP 2021/TTW/01187548Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Hospital ACA0022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is damage in the pelvic floor only visible in upright imaging. This damage have not been yet studied. The aim of this research is to assess the difference in levator ani muscle (LAM) damage in supine and upright position by means of MRI scans. Sixty-four patients with minimum stage 2 prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall or uterus, without previous pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery were scanned in a MR scanner in supine and upright position. Damage to the pubococcygeus muscle (PCM) and the iliococcygeal muscle (ICM) was scored as none, minor or major. For PCM, a previously established protocol was used. For ICM, a protocol for damage assessment was established and validated in this study, by determining the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The new ICM assessment protocol was established with ICC values of 0.68 (0.57-0.77) for supine and 0.81 (0.74-0.86) for upright assessment. 6.3% major ICM damage was found in supine vs. 51.6% in upright position with a significant difference of p < 0.001 for the sign-test. There was an underestimation of ICM damage in 59% of the cases in supine position. PCM damage scoring was not feasible on upright MRI's and therefore only assessed on supine scans. In our POP population we found 53.1% of the women with major damage to either the PCM or ICM and 32.8% with major damage in both, leading to a total of 85.9% of women with major damage to at least one structure. There is a significant difference in LAM damage assessment between supine and upright position. Supine imaging leads to a severe underestimation of ICM damage while for the PCM supine damage assessment remains superior.

Indexed as

Pelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapseAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPostureStanding PositionSupine PositionIliococcygeusLevator Ani muscleMagnetic resonance imagingPelvic organ prolapse

Identifiers

PMID40348792
PMCPMC12065856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.