ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025
Computational modeling of cancer cell metabolism along the catabolic-anabolic axes.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroRNA-15a/16 regulate protein metabolism and are associated with clinical outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Acylcarnitines in Cancer Metabolism: Mechanistic Insights and Stratification Potential.Cancers · 2026Review
- Mathematical Modeling in Cancer Metabolism: Tools for Translational Applications in Metabolism-Based Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abnormal metabolism is a hallmark of cancer, this was initially recognized nearly a century ago through the observation of aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells. Mitochondrial respiration can also drive tumor progression and metastasis. However, it remains largely unclear the mechanisms by which cancer cells mix and match different metabolic modalities (oxidative/reductive) and leverage various metabolic ingredients (glucose, fatty acids, glutamine) to meet their bioenergetic and biosynthetic needs. Here, we formulate a phenotypic model for cancer metabolism by coupling master gene regulators (AMPK, HIF-1, MYC) with key metabolic substrates (glucose, fatty acids, and glutamine). The model predicts that cancer cells can acquire four metabolic phenotypes: a catabolic phenotype characterized by vigorous oxidative processes-O, an anabolic phenotype characterized by pronounced reductive activities-W, and two complementary hybrid metabolic states-one exhibiting both high catabolic and high anabolic activity-W/O, and the other relying mainly on glutamine oxidation-Q. Using this framework, we quantified gene and metabolic pathway activity by developing scoring metrics based on gene expression. We validated the model-predicted gene-metabolic pathway association and the characterization of the four metabolic phenotypes by analyzing RNA-seq data of tumor samples from TCGA. Strikingly, carcinoma samples exhibiting hybrid metabolic phenotypes are often associated with the worst survival outcomes relative to other metabolic phenotypes. Our mathematical model and scoring metrics serve as a platform to quantify cancer metabolism and study how cancer cells adapt their metabolism upon perturbations, which ultimately could facilitate an effective treatment targeting cancer metabolic plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.