ArticleNPJ vaccines2025
Cellular immune signatures and differences of four porcine circovirus type 2 vaccines to heterologous PCV2d infection.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunoevaluation of a Prokaryotic-Expressed Goose Circovirus Capsid Subunit Vaccine.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Article
- Pollen-inspired multifunctional nanocarrier for porcine circovirus 2 vaccine delivery.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Detection of PCV2d in pig industry of the Iberian Peninsula.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- Characterization of T cell responses againstFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple PCV2 vaccines originating from different antigens and formula are commercially available and have shown great effectiveness in protecting pigs from clinical disease. However, our understanding of the immune mechanisms underlying these vaccine-induced protection is fairly limited, except for antibody responses. Head-to-head comparisons of T-cell responses induced by these vaccines in pigs would provide valuable insights into the mechanisms of protective immunity against PCV2. Here, T-cell responses in peripheral blood of pigs after vaccination with four representative PCV2 vaccines, as well as local and systemic recall responses following challenge with a PCV2d strain were examined. All four PCV2 vaccines induce a rapid cellular immune response that could be detected as early as 7 days post-vaccination. Some vaccine-primed CD4 T cells exhibit multifunctionality, being capable of secreting double (IFNγ/TNFα) and even triple cytokines (IFNγ/TNFα/IL-2) simultaneously. In contrast, a weak CD8 T cell response was also detected in the vaccinated pigs but just IFNγ/TNFα double producer and lack of cytotoxicity. These vaccine-activated CD4 and CD8 T cells displayed phenotypes of effector memory or terminally-differentiated effector memory T cells, which rapidly expand to subsequent PCV2d challenges. Prior-vaccinated pigs exhibited a stronger T cell cytokine response post-challenge, being most evident in the spleen. Notably, the cellular immune response induced by different types of PCV2 vaccines exhibited high similarity in phenotypic and functional properties, while showing significant differences in kinetics and magnitude. These results advance our understanding of cell-mediated immune protection afforded by different PCV2 vaccines and unravel fundamental differences in cellular immune response induced by PCV2 vaccines utilizing diverse technologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.