Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40348591›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2025

Believing that social change is possible: Collective efficacy to promote engagement and mobilization of non-Roma as allies.

Ana Urbiola, Lucía López-Rodríguez, Laura C Torres-Vega, Xenia-Daniela Poslon, Barbara Lášticová, József Pántya, Hanna Szekeres, Anna Kende

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana UrbiolaDepartment of Social Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Lucía López-RodríguezCenter for the Study of Migrations and Intercultural Relations (CEMyRI), Almería, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9153-0220
Laura C Torres-VegaDepartment of Social Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Xenia-Daniela PoslonInstitute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Barbara LášticováInstitute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
József PántyaInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Hanna SzekeresInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Anna KendeInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

European Commission: European Union's Rights, Equality, and Citizenship Programme 2014-2020) 963122-ENGAGE-REC-AG-2020/REC-RDIS-DISC-AG-2020MCIN/AEI/FSE+ RYC2022-035896-IMICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF, European Union PID2021-126085OB-I00Ministry of Universities, recualificación del sistema universitario españolMinistry of Universities/Recualificación del sistema universitario español RR_B_2022_02National Research and Innovation Research NKFI-K138429Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-23-0119Slovak Scientific Grant Agency VEGA 2/0102/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyzed the effect of collective efficacy on mobilizing allies for Roma rights and the role of legitimizing ideologies and perceived discrimination as moderators. In an online experiment, pooling two samples of non-Roma Hungarians (n = 397) and Spaniards (n = 339), participants were randomly assigned to a high (vs. low) efficacy condition and reported their perceived collective efficacy, collective action intentions, and participation for supporting Roma. Pooled analyses showed that participants were more willing to take action in the high (vs. low) efficacy condition, although meritocracy beliefs moderated the effects. In a second study in Slovakia (n = 454), with a control condition, we found indirect effects of the manipulation of collective efficacy, supporting the idea that decreasing perceived collective efficacy predicts lower collective action intentions and participation. In a third study in Hungary (n = 382), we disentangled collective efficacy from social norms and found indirect effects via perceived collective efficacy. Participants in the low efficacy condition (vs. high efficacy or control) perceived less collective efficacy as allies, which in turn was associated with lower collective action. We discuss the conceptualization of collective efficacy in experimental studies and its implications for the mobilization of equality.

Indexed as

Romani PeopleSocial ChangeSocial NormsAdolescentAdultCollective EfficacyFemaleHumansHungaryIntentionMaleMiddle AgedSlovakiaYoung Adultalliescollective actioncollective efficacyRoma

Identifiers

PMID40348591
PMCPMC12079007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.