ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2025
Advancement of an automatic segmentation pipeline for metallic artifact removal in post-surgical ACL MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to identify post-operative risk factors for re-tearing an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a combination of imaging signal intensity (SI) and cross-sectional area measurements of the healing ACL. During surgery micro-debris can result from drilling the osseous tunnels for graft and/or suture insertion. The debris presents a limitation when using post-surgical MRI to assess reinjury risk as it causes rapid magnetic field variations during acquisition, leading to signal loss within a voxel. The present study demonstrates how K-means clustering can refine an automatic segmentation algorithm to remove the lost signal intensity values induced by the artifacts in the image. MRI data were obtained from 82 patients enrolled in three prospective clinical trials of ACL surgery. Constructive Interference in Steady State MRIs were collected at 6 months post-operation. Manual segmentation of the ACL with metallic artifacts removed served as the gold standard. The accuracy of the automatic ACL segmentations was compared using Dice coefficient, sensitivity, and precision. The performance of the automatic segmentation was comparable to manual segmentation (Dice coefficient = .81, precision = .81, sensitivity = .82). The normalized average signal intensity was calculated as 1.06 (±0.25) for the automatic and 1.04 (±0.23) for the manual segmentation, yielding a difference of 2%. These metrics emphasize the automatic segmentation model's ability to precisely capture ACL signal intensity while excluding artifact regions. The automatic artifact segmentation model described here could enhance qMRI's clinical utility by allowing for more accurate and time-efficient segmentations of the ACL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.