Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40348199›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2025

Second-Generation Gadolinium-Bismuth Ultrasmall Nanoparticles Amplify the Effects of Clinical Radiation Therapy and Provide Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast.

Toby Morris, Zeinaf Muradova, Needa Brown, Léna Carmès, Romy Guthier, Meghna Iyer, Léa Seban, Arianna Liles, Stephanie Bennett, Mileni Isikawa and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Lanthanide Nanotheranostics in Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Toby MorrisDepartment of Physics and Applied Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Zeinaf MuradovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Needa BrownDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
Léna CarmèsInstitut Lumière-Matière, UMR, Université Lyon1-CNRS, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France; NH TherAguix SA, Meylan, France.
Romy GuthierDepartment of Physics and Applied Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts.
Meghna IyerWilliam Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan.
Léa SebanInstitut Lumière-Matière, UMR, Université Lyon1-CNRS, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France; NH TherAguix SA, Meylan, France.
Arianna LilesDepartment of Physics and Applied Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stephanie BennettBiological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Mileni IsikawaDepartamento de Física, FFCLRP- Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Michael LavelleDepartment of Physics and Applied Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Guillaume BortInstitut Lumière-Matière, UMR, Université Lyon1-CNRS, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France; Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR9187, INSERM, U1196, Chemistry and Modeling for the Biology of Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, UMR9187, INSERM, Chemistry and Modeling for the Biology of Cancer, Orsay, France.
François LuxInstitut Lumière-Matière, UMR, Université Lyon1-CNRS, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Olivier TillementInstitut Lumière-Matière, UMR, Université Lyon1-CNRS, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Sandrine DufortNH TherAguix SA, Meylan, France.
Geraldine LeDucNH TherAguix SA, Meylan, France.
Ross BerbecoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: Ross_Berbeco@dfci.harvard.edu.

Funding

Translation of a Bismuth-Gadolinium Nanoparticle for MR-guided Radiation TherapyR01CA240804 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BERBECO, ROSS I., TILLEMENT, OLIVIER · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAGuIX nanoparticles consisting of Gd atoms chelated to a polysiloxane matrix are under clinical evaluation as radiopharmaceuticals agents with radiation therapy (RT). A new generation, AGuIX-Bi, replaces 70% of the Gd atoms in AGuIX with Bi atoms, improving radiation dose amplification while maintaining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast. The therapeutic efficacy of AGuIX-Bi was investigated under clinical megavoltage and MRI conditions in 2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Murine (LLC) and human (A549) NSCLC were studied in mice, with animals inoculated and divided into cohorts for control (saline, AGuIX, and AGuIX-Bi) and irradiation (saline + RT, AGuIX + RT, and AGuIX-Bi + RT). Nanoparticle cohorts were injected 24 hours before delivering 10 Gy of irradiation using a 6 MV flattening-filter-free beam. Tumors were measured until euthanasia was necessary, taken as time-to-tumor doubling. Additionally, AGuIX and AGuIX-Bi phantoms were constructed with T1-weighted images and maps taken using a 3T clinical MRI scanner. T1-images of A549 inoculated mice were obtained on the same scanner with injection of AGuIX or AGuIX-Bi 2- and 24 hours before imaging.

resultsNo toxicity was observed because of nanoparticle injection, anesthesia, or irradiation. In both LLC and A549 models, AGuIX-Bi + RT significantly outperformed both saline + RT and AGuIX + RT in reducing tumor growth (P < .05). Median time-to-tumor doubling for AGuIX-Bi + RT compared with AGuIX + RT groups was increased by 160% for A549, and by 60% for LLC models (P < .05). Longitudinal relaxivity constants (r

conclusionsAGuIX-Bi nanoparticles proved more effective than AGuIX at delaying tumor growth for both NSCLC models while maintaining sufficient MRI contrast at 3T. Replacing some Gd atoms with bismuth improves the efficacy of AGuIX nanoparticles under clinical megavoltage energies without compromising imaging.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungContrast MediaGadoliniumLung NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNanoparticlesA549 CellsAnimalsCarcinoma, Lewis LungHumansMiceSiloxanesContrast MediaGadoliniumSiloxanes

Identifiers

PMID40348199
PMCPMC12354255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.