ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2025
Adults with down syndrome exhibit altered somatosensory cortical inhibition.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Magnetoencephalography in human neuroscience research: planning, piloting, implementation and quality assurance.Nature protocols · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Down syndrome (DS) is a developmental genetic disorder that is associated with an accelerated aging profile and high probability of early incidence Alzheimer's disease like symptoms. It is well established that there are morphological differences in the brains of adults with DS, but the net impact of the genetic disruption on cortical function remains poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, we used magnetoencephalographic (MEG) brain imaging to assess the somatosensory cortical activity elicited by a paired-pulse electrical stimulation of the right median nerve of adults with DS (N = 19; Age = 28.05 ± 7.9 yrs.) and neurotypical controls (NT) (N = 21; Age = 30.81 ± 8.2 yrs.). sLORETA was used to image neural responses to the somatosensory stimulation, which were centered on the left central sulcus posterior to the motor hand knob region. Our results revealed that adults with DS had weaker somatosensory cortical activity after the second electrical stimulation in the paired-pulse paradigm (DS = 594.1 ± 194.22 AU; NT = 750.48 ± 256.6; P = 0.038) and a pronounced hyper-gating response (DS = 78.9 ± 6.8 %; NT = 87.4 ± 9.9 %; P = 0.003). Together, these results suggest that adults with DS may have an imbalance in the excitatory/inhibitory ratio. These novel data enhance our understanding of the neurophysiological aberrations associated with DS and may hold promise in understanding the origins of Alzheimer's disease like symptoms in this population. Future studies should examine whether these inhibitory alterations are restricted to the sensorimotor cortices or extend across the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.