ArticlePatient education and counseling2025
Personal narratives to support learning about lung transplant for people with cystic fibrosis.
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesCystic fibrosis (CF) causes progressive respiratory disease and premature death. Lung transplantation (LTx) is an important treatment consideration for people with CF (PwCF). Among PwCF, does preparedness for LTx and knowledge about LTx improve by reading personal narratives from CF LTx recipients ("CF Stories")?
methodsAdults with CF were recruited and presented with online CF Stories. Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires assessed LTx preparedness, knowledge, and decisional conflict. Deductive thematic analysis of study visits was conducted.
resultsTwenty-five participants were included. Pre-intervention, 24 % (6/25) reported feeling "very prepared" to discuss LTx. Among the remaining 19, preparedness improved post-intervention for 74 % (n = 14, 95 % CI: 51-88 %), with 42 % (n = 8, 95 % CI: 23-64 %) transitioning to feeling "very prepared." Baseline transplant knowledge was high (100 % questions correct) among 48 % (12/25) of participants; among the remaining 13, 92 % (n = 12, 95 % CI: 67-99 %) scored 100 % post-intervention. Decisional conflict improved for 67 % of participants (16/24), with a mean individual Decisional Conflict Scale change of -9.4 (95 % CI: -2.8, -15.9; p = 0.01). Thematic analysis revealed that participants valued practical LTx insights and relatable stories, identifying key medical information for LTx discussions.
conclusionsCF Stories improved knowledge and preparedness for LTx discussions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Personal narratives could enhance preparedness for LTx discussions and decision-making for PwCF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.