ArticlePsycho-oncology2025
Qualitative Findings From a Survey Measuring Informational Needs and Quality of Life of Women Living With Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Information Needs of Breast Cancer Patients at All Stages of Their Journey: A Scoping Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) may have different support requirements to those with early stage breast cancer (EBC). These differences can be substantial, particularly as care pathways and information are often designed around the latter. There is limited understanding of how these discrepancies impact patients with MBC.
aimsIn the LIMBER study (Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer), we explored the distinct and unmet needs of people living with MBC.
methodsIn collaboration with people living with MBC and healthcare professionals (HCPs), we developed an online survey comprising fixed and free text responses. Fixed responses and overall study demographics from the main LIMBER study have been published elsewhere. A framework analysis of the free text comments is reported here.
resultsThe resulting thematic map has seven main themes - friends and family, reactions of others, healthcare professionals, systems & processes, knowledge & information, outlook & goals and wellbeing. Participants reflected that comments made by friends and family were often well-meaning but showed misunderstanding of the disease. This was particularly noticeable in understanding the difference between MBC and EBC. There were references to the lack of support and information from HCPs.
conclusionsThe analysis of free text comments from this survey demonstrates the impact that MBC can have, particularly without robust support or accessible information. Understanding areas where patients have outstanding needs provides insight into how best to promote coping strategies and improved quality of life, while informing those who provide informal and formal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.