Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40347432›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2025

Next-Generation Strategies for Enamel Repair and Regeneration: Advances in Biomaterials and Translational Challenges.

Eman M Sedek, Ahmed A Holiel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eman M SedekDental Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ahmed A HolielConservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. ahmed.holiel@alexu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-7879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnamel regeneration and remineralization are critical for restoring enamel integrity, as natural enamel lacks the ability to regenerate due to the absence of ameloblasts. The increasing prevalence of dental caries and the irreversible nature of enamel damage highlight the need for advanced repair strategies.

methodsThis review examines the latest advancements in enamel regeneration and remineralization, focusing on biomaterials, nanotechnology-based approaches, and bioengineering strategies. Google Scholar, Scopus (Elsevier), and PubMed databases were used for the selection of literature. The search included key terms such as "enamel regeneration," "biomimetic enamel repair," "stem cell-based enamel regeneration," "nanotechnology in enamel repair," "hydroxyapatite enamel remineralization," and "biomaterials for enamel remineralization."

resultsVarious strategies have been explored for enamel remineralization, including self-assembling peptides, dendrimers, hydrogels, and electrospun mats, each demonstrating varying success in laboratory and preclinical studies. While casein-phosphopeptide-stabilized amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) combined with fluoride remains a widely used clinical remineralization agent, integrating CPP-ACP with nanotechnology is an emerging area requiring further research. Enamel bioengineering approaches utilizing stem/progenitor cells offer potential, though challenges remain in achieving clinical translation.

conclusionDespite advancements, replicating the hierarchical structure and mechanical properties of natural enamel remains challenging. Nanotechnology-driven approaches, bioengineered scaffolds, and interdisciplinary collaboration hold promise for optimizing enamel regeneration techniques. Further research is necessary to enhance clinical applicability and develop scalable, effective treatments for enamel restoration.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsDental EnamelRegenerationTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHumansStem CellsTooth RemineralizationBiocompatible MaterialsBiomimetic materialsEnamelHydroxyapatitesRemineralizationTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40347432
PMCPMC12297108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.