ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Detection capability of the Medical Imaging Projection System for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Medical Imaging Projection System (MIPS) projects fluorescence ICG images on the surgical field. In this study, we aimed to assess sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification by the MIPS in patients with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) administration and compare the utility of the MIPS with the radioisotope (RI) method.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with primary breast cancer who underwent SLN biopsy using the MIPS at Kyoto University Hospital between April 2020 and December 2024. The primary endpoint was the identification rate of SLNs. The secondary endpoints included the number of positive SLNs and SLNs detected per patient.
resultsThe analysis included 470 procedures (448 patients), of which 56 (11.9%) were conducted after NAC. The identification rate of SLNs by the MIPS was 99.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.5-99.9) in all procedures and 98.2% (95% CI, 90.6-99.7) after NAC. The median number of SLNs identified per patient was 3 (range, 2-4) by the MIPS and 2 (range, 1-3) by the RI method (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the number of SLNs between patients who received NAC and those who did not (3 vs 3, P = 0.84). Seventy-eight positive SLNs were excised, all of which were accurately identified by the MIPS.
conclusionsThis study suggested that the identification rate of SLNs by the MIPS was high regardless of the presence or absence of preceding systemic chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.