ArticleWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2025
Performance of EMA algorithm, 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria, and EMA-ACR/EULAR algorithm in classifying pediatric ANCA-associated vasculitis: a national cohort study in China.
Article in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a type of necrotizing vasculitis with poor prognosis, which is more severe in children. Classifying AAV patients may be helpful for diagnosis and management. However, present classification criteria for pediatric AAV are developed mainly based on adults, which have limitations in clinical practice. In this study, we introduced an updated algorithm based on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) algorithm in conjunction with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) criteria. This new approach aims to resolve the issue of duplicate classification present in the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria and to refine the existing EMA algorithm.
methodsThis study included 179 pediatric patients diagnosed with AAV across 17 centers in China. Patients were classified using the EMA algorithm, the ACR/EULAR criteria, and the EMA-ACR/EULAR algorithm. The Kappa value and Net Reclassification Index (NRI) were used to evaluate the classification performance of these criteria.
resultsAccording to the EMA algorithm, 136 (76.0%) patients were classified with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and 14 (7.8%) with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), while 29 (16.2%) remained unclassifiable. According to the ACR/EULAR criteria, 145 (81.0%) patients were classified with MPA, 14 (7.8%) with GPA, 2 (1.1%) with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), and 4 (2.2%) with both MPA and GPA, while 14 (7.8%) remained unclassifiable. The EMA-ACR/EULAR algorithm classified 124 patients (69.3%) as MPA, 26 (14.5%) as GPA, and 2 (1.1%) as EGPA, while 27 (15.1%) were unclassified. The Kappa values between the EMA algorithm and ACR/EULAR criteria for GPA and MPA were 0.225 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.000-0.456, P = 0.003] and 0.357 (95% CI 0.196-0.518, P < 0.001). Compared to these two criteria, the EMA-ACR/EULAR algorithm demonstrated positive NRIs in the classification of both GPA (0.702, 95% CI 0.258-1.146, P = 0.002; 0.547 95% CI 0.150-0.944, P = 0.007) and MPA (0.425, 95% CI 0.209-0.642, P < 0.001; 0.519, 95% CI 0.305-0.733, P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe EMA-ACR/EULAR algorithm addresses the limitations of the 1990 ACR criteria within the EMA framework and resolves the issue of duplicate classification in the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria. However, further research is necessary to validate the superiority of the EMA-ACR/EULAR algorithm in the clinical classification of pediatric AAV patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.