Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40347420›Full record

ReviewCognitive processing2025

Advances in complex thinking and neurotechnologies in education: a bibliometric analysis of research trends.

Jorge Sanabria-Z, Manuel Cebral-Loureda, Javier M Antelis, SeungHee Lee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive processing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jorge Sanabria-ZSchool of Architecture, Art and Design, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
Manuel Cebral-LouredaSchool of Humanities and Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico, Nuevo Leon. manuel.cebral@tec.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6359-2427
Javier M AntelisSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
SeungHee LeeInstitute of Art and Design, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

Funding

Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey E061 - EHE-GI02 - D-T3 - EInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey IJXT070-23EG99001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscience research to decode cognitive and emotional processes has been widely embraced in education. The development of methodologies, case studies, and new technologies have advanced our understanding of students' complex thinking. Despite these advancements, long-term analysis at the convergence of neurosciences, education, and complex thinking remains limited. To address this gap, we conducted a bibliometric review using the prism method, spanning from 1960 to 2023 to map research trends, thematic evolutions, and future challenges. Our analysis of 3792 Scopus-indexed studies using advanced data visualization techniques yielded the following findings: (1) a predominant focus on critical thinking, with creativity driving innovative approaches that enhance problem-solving; (2) growing integration of neurotechnologies-such as EEG and neuroimaging-to assess and optimize cognitive engagement in educational settings; (3) an increasing emphasis on metacognition, highlighting its role as a reflective thinking strategy that fosters cogntive control and higher-order thinking; and (4) emerging research on executive functions, particularly their role in fostering decision-making and cognitive flexibility in learning environments. These findings contribute to the understanding of cognitive processes and inform practical applications in education, including the design of personalized learning strategies, real-time cognitive assessment tools, and neurotechnology-supported pedagogical models. The study advocates an interdisciplinary approach, integrating neuroscientific insights into complex thinking to enhance cognitive processing within STEAM education.

Indexed as

BibliometricsEducationNeurosciencesThinkingCreativityExecutive FunctionHumansComplex thinkingEducational innovationHigher educationNeuroscienceNeurotechnologies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.