ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025
The diagnostic value of whole-body HYNIC-PSMA 11 -Tc [
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Detection rate of [Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis prospective study aims to compare the diagnostic yield of conventional imaging modalities, including CT scan, bone scan, with MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 63 treatment-naïve PCa patients were included in the study for the initial staging. Each patient underwent a chest and abdominopelvic CT scan, bone scan, and
resultsRegion-based analysis revealed osseous metastatic regions in 78 (median 0 per patient, range 0-9), 25, and 87 (median 2 per patient, range 0-9) regions in the PSMA-11 scan, CT scan, and bone scan, respectively. CT scan was limited in assessing all nine osseous regions due to its restricted field of view. The positive detection rate for local lymph-node and distant metastases (distant lymphatic, osseous, and visceral) was 18/63 (28.6%) and 23/63 (41.3%) for the PSMA-11 scan, and 20/63 (31.8%) and 27/63 (42.9%) for the CT scan, with no significant difference between the two modalities. Overall, the combined findings of the PSMA-11 scan, CT scan, and bone scan were positive in 31/63 (49.2%), 34/63 (53.9%), and 32/63 (50.8%) patients, respectively. Equivocal findings were reported in 1 PSMA-11 scan, 13 CT scans, and 4 bone scans. When equivocal findings were considered as positive for metastasis, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 78.2%, 60%, and 96.4% for the PSMA-11 scan; 76.1%, 62.9%, and 89.3% for the CT scan; and 85%, 78.6%, and 91.4% for the bone scan. There was a strong agreement in disease staging and overall findings between the PSMA-11 scan and the combination of CT and bone scans (Ƙ = 0.949 and Ƙ = 0.905, respectively; p < 0.001).
conclusionThe comparable accuracy and high concordance between
Indexed as
Identifiers
40347415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.