ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2025
Success Rates for Endoscopic Placement of Post-Pyloric Nasoenteric Tube Underperform Expectations.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewEnteral nutrition plays a pivotal role in maintaining nutritional status and supporting recovery in hospitalized patients who are unable to meet their caloric requirements. The benefits of enteral nutrition include preserving gut integrity, reducing infection risks, and supporting immune function, which are vital in critically ill and post-operative patients. Nasoenteric feeding tubes often serve as important tools to deliver enteral nutrition efficiently, yet their optimal placement remains a subject of significant clinical consideration. RECENT
findingsNasoenteric feeding tubes can be compromised by placement-related complications such as displacement, malpositioning, and tube-related discomfort. Our review of the relevant literature is complemented by review of our recent data. Our own clinical experience suggests that endoscopic placement of naso-enteric feeding tubes fails during the wire exchange process. SUMMARY: This report reviews the importance of enteral nutrition for enhancing patient outcomes, documents findings from our retrospective study on endoscopically placed nasoenteric feeding tubes and focuses on the challenges and future advancements in nasoenteric feeding tube placement techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40347410What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.