ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Impact of a high-power 810 nm diode laser on intra-dentinal decontamination, dual-species biofilm reduction, and smear layer removal: an ex vivo study.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the impact of an 810 nm high-power diode laser on decontaminating both surface and intradentinal biofilm, as well as removing the smear layer. Forty human mandibular premolars were contaminated with a biofilm composed of Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans. The teeth were divided into groups and treated with NaOCl 2.5% + PUI, saline solution + 810 nm laser, NaOCl 2.5% + PUI + 810 nm laser, and a control group. The samples were then evaluated using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Another 40 teeth, prepared as dentin discs, were contaminated with the same biofilm to assess surface decontamination. Additionally, 80 bovine dentin discs with an induced smear layer, placed in the apical third of mesial root canals of 3D-printed teeth, underwent similar treatments. Pre- and post-treatment images were obtained using an environmental scanning electron microscope. Data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA test and Tukey's test, respectively. Intradentinal disinfection rates were 67,33% for PUI, 51,50% for the 810 nm laser, and 55,32% for the PUI + 810 nm laser, with no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). Surface decontamination rates were 39,52%, 51,27%, and 45,20% for the respective groups, also without significant differences (p > 0.05). No significant differences were found regarding smear layer removal (p > 0.05). The 810 nm diode laser with saline achieved disinfection similar to 2.5% sodium hypochlorite with ultrasound. Combining laser and PUI didn't improve disinfection. None of the studied protocol removed the smear layer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40347363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.