ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Experience implementing the serious illness care program through virtual training of multidisciplinary teams at a regional cancer centre.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What makes serious illness conversations acceptable? A mixed-methods study of patient and caregiver experiences in oncology and cardiology.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) was launched at the Juravinski Cancer Centre (JCC) to promote early, high-quality goals of care conversations with patients experiencing advanced cancer. Training was provided to multidisciplinary disease site teams (DSTs). The objective of this study is to validate the virtual SICP training format and assess the clinician and patient experience after 6 months of implementation.
methodsClinicians completed SICP training through a virtual workshop on Zoom and responded to surveys describing their experience before and after the training. Clinicians then completed a validated survey 6 months later, describing their experience of implementing serious illness conversations (SIC) into practice. Consenting patients were contacted within 2 weeks of a SIC encounter and responded to validated questions about their experience.
resultsTraining was provided to 52 healthcare providers in the breast, lung and brain malignancy DSTs. Overall, the virtual training format was well received. Training could be improved by allowing more time to practice skills and including more video examples. By 6 months, 39% of clinicians reported conducting SIC. Most users reported that SIC helps them understand patient goals. Among non-users, insufficient time was the most cited barrier. Nurses in a non-primary care model reported difficulty engaging in SIC. Most patients felt that SIC was a worthwhile experience.
conclusionOur study demonstrates the feasibility of the virtual SICP implementation process. Additionally, SICP was successfully delivered across multidisciplinary DSTs. Training will continue rolling out incrementally for all DSTs at the JCC, exploring the incorporation of self-learning modules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40347316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.