ArticleOdontology2026
Efficacy of two different treatment modalities for juvenile patients with anterior disk displacement without reduction: an 18-month follow-up study.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of adolescent patients with anterior disk displacement without reduction (ADDwoR) who were treated with disk repositioning through suturing or arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid (HA) combined with stabilization splint (SS). A total of 96 ADDwoR patients aged ranging from 12 to 18 years, were divided into two groups, including 52 patients in Group A (underwent disk repositioning by suturing) and 44 patients in Group B (underwent arthrocentesis plus HA combined with SS). Condylar height, disk length, maximum mouth opening (MMO), maximal protrusive movement (PM), left/right maximal lateral movement (LLM/RLM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were comparatively analyzed between the two groups before and after treatment. Baselined data analysis showed there was no statistical significance in condylar height, disk length, MMO, PM, LLM, RLM, and VAS values between two groups preoperatively. Postoperatively, values of condylar height and disk length in Group A were larger than those in Group B (all P < 0.001); whereas PM, LLM, and RLM values of Group B were all significantly larger than those of Group A (all P < 0.001). However, no statistical difference was obtained in MMO and VAS score between two groups after treatment (all P > 0.05). Both two surgical techniques can effectively relieve pain and improve MMO of adolescent patients with ADDwoR. The maximal protrusive and lateral movement of Group B were superior to those of Group A, while the latter can effectively enhance condylar development and prevent mandibular deformities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40347314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.