Observational studyInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Peritoneal reflection involvement as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Long-term oncological outcomes from a prospective study.
Observational study in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the relevance of peritoneal reflection involvement in long-term oncological outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.
methodsProspective observational study from a specialized colorectal unit that included a consecutive series of patients undergoing mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Peritoneal reflection (PR) involvement was evaluated on pathological examination using Shepherd's classification. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence (LR) were assessed.
resultsOne hundred sixty patients were included in the present analysis. Peritoneal involvement was present in 28.2% of the 85 tumors above or at the level of PR. There were no differences in OS, DFS, or LR according to tumor's height location. The 5-year OS, DFS, and LR for tumors involving PR were 58.3%, 61.7%, and 30.3%, respectively. Patients with peritoneal involvement had a higher LR rate (p = 0.02) and shorter OS (p = 0.04). Shepherd's grade 4 peritoneal involvement was an independent risk factor for OS (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-9.5, p = 0.04) and LR (HR 4.2; 95% CI 1.2-16.9, p = 0.04).
conclusionAfter rectal cancer resection, peritoneal involvement is an independent risk factor for local recurrence and poor survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.