Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40347257›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Ultrasound innovations in abdominal radiology: evaluation of focal liver lesions.

David P Burrowes, Christine D Merrill, Stephanie R Wilson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David P BurrowesUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Christine D MerrillUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Stephanie R WilsonUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. srwilson@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal liver lesions (FLLs) are common and are often first identified on abdominal ultrasound examinations. Although CT and MRI were historically required to noninvasively characterize many FLLs, introduction of microbubble contrast agents produced a groundbreaking change as contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) showed vascularity to the capillary level for the first time. CEUS shows specific arterial phase enhancement patterns in benign lesions and accurately differentiates malignant lesions based on the timing and intensity of washout. Parametric time of arrival and microvascular imaging techniques can demonstrate vascularity in FLLs with significantly improved sensitivity compared with conventional Doppler techniques. Shear-wave elastography and quantitative ultrasound are generally used to evaluate diffuse liver disease but show promise in evaluation of FLLs.

Indexed as

Liver DiseasesLiver NeoplasmsContrast MediaElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansLiverMicrobubblesUltrasonographyContrast MediaCEUSFocal liver lesionsMicrovascular imagingUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.