ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Targeted antineoplastic therapy in critically ill cancer patients: a multicenter analysis of the iCHOP registry.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 20% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients have cancer, and their prognosis has markedly improved in recent years. In addition to improved treatment in the ICU, this is a result of advancements in cancer therapies, including the use of targeted therapies (TTs), such as antibodies and small-molecule kinase inhibitors. Despite the increasing use of TT, there are currently no comprehensive studies examining critically ill cancer patients receiving TT in the ICU. We studied the clinical characteristics of a multicenter cohort of cancer patients who received TT in the ICU. To this end, we extracted data from the iCHOP Registry, comprising critically ill cancer patients from nine centers in Germany and Austria, and analyzed patient characteristics, cancer therapies, and survival outcomes. We then employed Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan‒Meier survival analyses to explore factors associated with mortality. Of the 1,762 cancer patients admitted to the ICU who were analyzed for this study, 106 patients (6%) received TT in the ICU, such as antibody-based treatments, kinase inhibitors and proteasome inhibitors. Although the TT recipients were younger, there were several pronounced high-risk features in the TT cohort, as indicated by a greater proportion of hematologic malignancies and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), a greater percentage of progressive disease and fewer patients in complete remission at ICU admission than in patients not receiving TT in the ICU. Despite these more pronounced risk features, TT patients had a slightly longer median OS than did the other patients according to Kaplan‒Meier analysis. The factors associated with mortality according to Cox proportional hazards regression analysis included advanced directives, disease progression, SOFA score, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), renal replacement therapy, and duration of ICU and hospital stay. Critically ill cancer patients receiving TT in the ICU had distinct characteristics but had comparable survival outcomes compared to patients receiving any other or no antineoplastic therapy in the ICU. While disease status at ICU admission remains crucial, the present study indicates the feasibility and potential benefits of TT in selected ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.