ReviewSkeletal radiology2025
Imaging in clinical trials of axial spondyloarthritis: what type of imaging should be used.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory condition predominantly affecting the sacroiliac joints and spine. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to prevent structural damage and improve patient outcomes. Imaging plays a pivotal role in axSpA diagnosis, monitoring, and clinical trials, offering insights into both inflammatory activity and structural progression. Conventional radiography has been foundational for detecting structural changes, such as syndesmophytes and erosions, but it is limited by poor sensitivity for early disease detection and significant interobserver variability. Advanced imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and low-dose computed tomography (ld-CT), have emerged as more sensitive tools. MRI excels in identifying active inflammation, particularly bone marrow edema, and is integral to early diagnosis and disease monitoring. ld-CT provides superior spatial resolution for detecting structural lesions while minimizing radiation exposure. However, challenges remain in achieving standardized imaging protocols and consistent scoring systems across clinical trials. Scoring systems like the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS), Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scores, and Berlin methods require rigorous calibration to ensure reliability. The purpose of this review is to explore the strengths and limitations as well as the use in clinical trials of the different imaging modalities and to offer guidance on selecting the most suitable imaging techniques for assessing both disease activity and structural progression in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.