ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Laboratory evolution of the bacterial genome structure through insertion sequence activation.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fine-scale structural diversification among closely relatedApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Limits of a Glycine Betaine-Derived Xenobiotic as a Trojan Horse Antimicrobial.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genome structure fundamentally shapes bacterial physiology, ecology, and evolution. Though insertion sequences (IS) are known drivers of drastic evolutionary changes in the genome structure, the process is typically slow and challenging to observe in the laboratory. Here, we developed a system to accelerate IS-mediated genome structure evolution by introducing multiple copies of a high-activity IS in Escherichia coli. We evolved the bacteria under relaxed neutral conditions, simulating those leading to IS expansion in host-restricted endosymbionts and pathogens. Strains accumulated a median of 24.5 IS insertions and underwent over 5% genome size changes within ten weeks, comparable to decades-long evolution in wild-type strains. The detected interplay of frequent small deletions and rare large duplications updates the view of genome reduction under relaxed selection from a simple consequence of the deletion bias to a nuanced picture including transient expansions. The high IS activity resulted in structural variants of IS and the emergence of composite transposons, illuminating potential evolutionary pathways for ISs and composite transposons. The extensive genome rearrangements we observed establish a baseline for assessing the fitness effects of IS insertions, genome size changes, and rearrangements, advancing our understanding of how mobile elements shape bacterial genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.