Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40347110›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2025

The human photosensitive epilepsy model for clinical proof-of-principle trials of novel antiseizure medications: 2. Analysis of drug trials and predictive value of the model.

Wolfgang Löscher, Dorothée Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wolfgang LöscherTranslational Neuropharmacology Lab, NIFE, Department of Experimental Otology of the ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9648-8973
Dorothée Kasteleijn-Nolst TrenitéDepartment of Neurosurgery and Epilepsy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6659-2614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical development of novel antiseizure medications (ASMs) would benefit from an early proof of principle (POP) model. The photosensitivity model, which uses the photoparoxysmal electroencephalographic response (PPR) as a surrogate of seizures, is currently the only human model that allows POP trials of investigational compounds after a single drug administration. Typically, trials in this model are performed as single-blinded, placebo-controlled phase IIa POP studies, evaluating a range of doses in small groups of epilepsy patients. In the second part of this review, based on the background information provided in Part 1, we analyze the outcome of all published trials performed over roughly 50 years. Many of the 35 drugs tested in the model were also examined in traditional add-on trials in patients with epilepsy, thus allowing analysis of the predictivity of the model. Drugs were categorized into three groups: drugs that suppressed PPR; drugs that exerted no effect on PPR; and drugs that increased PPR, indicating a proconvulsant effect. For the vast majority of drugs, the model correctly predicted the drugs' activity during long-term studies in patients with different types of epilepsy, including focal onset epilepsies. For some investigational compounds, the model detected proconvulsant activity that had not been observed in preclinical animal experiments and phase I studies in healthy volunteers, demonstrating the value of the model for adverse event assessment in patients with epilepsy. Limitations of the model are that it does not predict the extent of drug resistance of patients' seizures during chronic administration or efficacy differentiation of the novel drug from existing ASMs. Photosensitive POP trials are a useful tool to quantitatively predict drug efficacy and in aiding dose selection for subsequent larger phase IIb trials with chronic drug administration.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsClinical Trials as TopicEpilepsy, ReflexProof of Concept StudyElectroencephalographyHumansPredictive Value of TestsAnticonvulsantsanimal modelsintermittent photic stimulationmechanism of actionpharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsphotoparoxysmal EEG responseproof of concept

Identifiers

PMID40347110
PMCPMC12371661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.