Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40347093›Full record

ReviewJournal of feline medicine and surgery2025

Fundoscopy in cats: a practical guide and common findings.

Natalia Giannakopoulou, Ben Blacklock

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia GiannakopoulouThe Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-3118-2836
Ben BlacklockThe Hospital for Small Animals, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4136-5674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

practical relevanceComprehensive examination of the feline fundus should be in every clinician's arsenal. It is an integral part of both the physical and ophthalmic examination, especially in senior cats and in the presence of intraocular inflammation and visual impairment. Fundoscopy provides critical insight into a wide range of systemic diseases, often leading to quicker diagnoses and better treatment outcomes. CLINICAL CHALLENGES: Practice is needed to become proficient and take high-quality photos of the retina. Distinguishing between normal variants and pathological findings can be challenging initially. EVIDENCE BASE: This review includes information from published references of common retinal pathologies in cats, as well as the authors' extensive experience on performing fundoscopy. EQUIPMENT: The essential tools for fundoscopy include a direct and indirect ophthalmoscope, condensing lens and a focal light source. High-quality images of the fundus can be achieved with any smartphone. AUDIENCE: This review is aimed at veterinary clinicians and outlines all the steps and equipment needed to confidently perform fundoscopy. It also provides tips on how to capture photos of the fundus using a smartphone. Common findings are discussed in relation to different retinal pathologies.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesOphthalmoscopyRetinal DiseasesAnimalsCatsFundus OculichorioretinitisFIPfundoscopyhypertensionophthalmoscopyRetinasmartphone

Identifiers

PMID40347093
PMCPMC12065995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.