ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2025
Morphometric-Assisted Prediction of Developmental Toxicity Using Stem Cell-Based Embryo Models in Microwells.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Charting Morphotoxicity With Complementary Embryo Models.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Morphometric-Assisted Prediction of Developmental Toxicity Using Stem Cell-Based Embryo Models in Microwells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital abnormalities cause ≈3% of fetal defects and premature deaths in Europe, often due to maternal exposure to toxicants. To mitigate the ethical and logistical challenges of animal studies, stem cell-based models are being exploredthat offer scalable readouts at various stages of embryogenesis. However, most current in vitro models are limited in complexity, throughput, automation compatibility or real-time spatio-temporal read-outs. In this study, a scalable, automated platform capable of imaging and quantifying morphological features such as shape, size, texture, and marker intensity is presented. Using a microwell screening platform, XEn/EpiCs, a peri-implantation stage embryo model that mimics eXtraembryonic Endoderm and Epiblast co-development, is robustly generated and used to screen a library of 38 reported compounds. Unlike conventional cytotoxicity assays, this approach also evaluates development-disrupting morphological changes, termed "morphotoxicity", thereby offering complementary insights that may improve the prediction of developmental toxicity across cell types. This pilot study shows thathigh doses of compoundslike retinoic acid, caffeine, ampyrone, and dexamethasone, significantly disrupt XEn/EpiC development, causing morphotoxic effects with or without affecting cell viability. Together, thisstudy highlights the importance of complementing cytotoxicity assessments with morphotoxicity read-outs, emphasizing its potential to enhance the evaluation of teratogenic risks in toxicity tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.