Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40347060›Full record

ArticleJournal of community psychology2025

A Scoping Review of Neighborhood Effects and Health Among Children and Adolescents: Measurement and Design Characteristics.

Bria Gresham, Canan Karatekin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bria GreshamInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2750-5725
Canan KaratekinInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3894-5184

Funding

Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023This study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of research have explored how neighborhood conditions relate to child and adolescent health, spawning numerous reviews focused on specific predictors, outcomes, or populations. Less is known about the design and characteristics underpinning this work. We conducted a scoping review of 754 studies examining neighborhood conditions and health-related factors among children and adolescents (aged 0-18) published between 2015 and 2024. This growing area of literature is largely based on observational, cross-sectional evidence of associations between objective socioeconomic status (SES) conditions and health, with over 100 studies focusing on associations between neighborhood SES and physical health, specifically. The findings of this review suggest that the current "state of the science" on neighborhoods and health among children and adolescents often does not lend itself to strong developmental conclusions, due to a reliance on observational, cross-sectional designs. Moreover, extant literature provides limited insight into whether neighborhood conditions beyond SES are associated with health. Longitudinal studies of multidomain neighborhood conditions and health represent important directions for future research.

Indexed as

Child HealthHealth StatusNeighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSocial ClassSocioeconomic Factorsadolescentschildrenhealthneighborhoodsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID40347060
PMCPMC12063516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.