ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Virtual Clinical Trial Reveals Significant Clinical Potential of Targeting Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Microglia to Treat Glioblastoma.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glioblastoma Stem Cells and Tumour Microenvironment: Interactions Across Hypoxia, Vasculature and Immune Modulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A Nonparametric Approach to Practical Identifiability of Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, with a median survival of 15 months with treatment. Standard-of-care (SOC) consists of resection, radio- and chemotherapy. Clinical trials involving PD-1 inhibition with nivolumab combined with SOC failed to increase survival. A quantitative understanding of the interactions between the tumor and its immune environment that drive treatment outcomes is currently lacking. As such, we developed a mathematical model of tumor growth that considers CD8+ T cells, pro- and antitumoral tumor-associated macrophages and microglia (TAMs), SOC, and nivolumab. Using our model, we studied five TAM-targeting strategies currently under investigation for solid tumors. Our results show that PD-1 inhibition fails due to a lack of CD8+ T cell recruitment during treatment, explained by TAM-driven immunosuppressive mechanisms. Our model predicts that while reducing TAM numbers does not improve prognosis, altering their functions to counter their protumoral properties has the potential to considerably reduce post-treatment tumor burden. In particular, restoring antitumoral TAM phagocytic activity through anti-CD47 treatment in combination with SOC was predicted to nearly eradicate the tumor. By studying time-varying efficacy with the same half-life as the anti-CD47 antibody Hu5F9-G4, our model predicts that repeated dosing of anti-CD47 provides sustained control of tumor growth. We propose that targeting TAMs by enhancing their antitumoral properties is a highly promising avenue to treat glioblastoma and warrants future clinical development. Together, our results provide proof-of-concept that mechanistic mathematical modeling can uncover the mechanisms driving treatment outcomes and explore the potential of novel treatment strategies for hard-to-treat tumors like glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.