Trial reportClinical pharmacology in drug development2025
A 2-Part, Open-Label, Phase 1 Bioequivalence and Food-Effect Study of Ubrogepant in Healthy Adult Participants.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This Phase 1 study of ubrogepant was conducted to establish the bioequivalence (BE) of the 50- and 100-mg to-be-marketed (TBM) tablet formulations with the clinical trial (CT) 100-mg tablet formulation and evaluate the food effect on the bioavailability of the 100-mg TBM tablet. This 2-part study enrolled healthy participants aged 18-45 years. Part A assessed BE following a single dose of TBM versus CT tablets. Part B evaluated the impact of a high-fat meal on ubrogepant pharmacokinetics. Safety and tolerability were assessed along with standard pharmacokinetic parameters. In Part A (n = 47), the geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals for maximum plasma drug concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time t, and AUC from time zero to infinity for the TBM and CT formulations demonstrated BE. The time to peak exposure was the same for both formulations. In Part B (n = 18), a high-fat meal delayed time to peak exposure and reduced maximum plasma drug concentration by 22%, with no effect on AUC. The occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events was low, and the majority were mild. Ubrogepant TBM and CT tablets (1 × 100 mg or 2 × 50 mg) were bioequivalent under fasted conditions, and a high-fat meal had no clinically relevant effect on the bioavailability of the TBM tablet formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.