ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2026
Is the Mayo adhesive probability score predictive of post-operative Clavien-Dindo complication grade in laparoscopic adrenalectomy?
Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mayo adhesive probability score predicts perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLaparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) continues to be considered the optimum approach to the surgical treatment of small benign adrenal tumours. The present study explores the correlation between the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score, derived from computed tomography images and delineating such perinephric fat characteristics as thickness and adhesiveness, and post-operative complications in patients undergoing LA. PATIENTS AND
methodsData of patients who underwent LA between 2013 and 2023 were subjected to a retrospective analysis, and MAP scores were calculated for all patients. Intraoperative and post-operative surgical outcomes, as well as any complications, were categorised using Modified Clavien-Dindo grading, and the relationship between their MAP scores and outcomes was analysed.
resultsThe mean body mass index, rate of overweight patients, Clavien-Dindo scores of II, III or IV, surgical time, hospitalisation duration, transfusion requirement and post-operative blood loss of the group of patients with MAP scores of 2-3 were significantly higher than those in the group with MAP scores in the 0-1 range ( P < 0.05). Each one-point increase in MAP score led to a 2.559-times greater probability of a Clavien-Dindo Grade > I (95% confidence interval: 1.391-4.708, P < 0.05).
conclusionA high MAP score is associated with Grade II and higher Clavien-Dindo complications in LA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.