ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2025
Clinical Characteristics and Safety Profiles of Japanese Psoriasis Patients Who Continued Apremilast Treatment for 6 and 12 Months: A Post Hoc Analysis of an Apremilast Postmarketing Surveillance Study.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03284879 (OTEZLA® Tablets Drug Use-Results Survey), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
OTEZLA® Tablets Drug Use-Results Survey
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Research Trends in Apremilast for Psoriasis: A Bibliometric Analysis (2008-2024).Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor approved for moderate to severe psoriasis in Japan. Apremilast significantly improved Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) both at 6 and 12 months in a previously published primary post-surveillance study. Here, we performed a post hoc analysis of the surveillance data to evaluate patient characteristics, effectiveness, and safety among psoriasis patients who continued apremilast for 6 and 12 months. The PMS included 992 patients, of whom 646 of 992 patients continued treatment for 6 months and 509 of 992 patients subsequently continued treatment for 12 months. Baseline characteristics between these groups were similar. Among 992 patients, the treatment persistence rate was 65.1% at 6 months and 51.3% at 12 months after the start of apremilast treatment. PGA 0/1 response was 47.9% at 6 months and 60.8% at 12 months, whereas DLQI 0/1 responses at 6 months and 12 months were 38.5% and 58.7%, respectively. Among 646 patients who continued apremilast for 6 months, diarrhea was reported in 60 patients (9.3%), nausea in 35 patients (5.4%), and headache in 11 (1.7%) patients, which were mainly observed within the first month since treatment initiation. In 509 patients who continued apremilast for 12 months, diarrhea was reported in 43 patients (8.5%), nausea in 24 patients (4.7%), and headache in 6 (1.2%) patients; similar frequencies of these adverse reactions were observed within 6 months and between 6 and 12 months of follow-up. It is important to continue apremilast by appropriately managing diarrhea and nausea in real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.