ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Sleep Staging From Oximetry and Photoplethysmography-SleepAI.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Photoplethysmography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning With Genetic and Clinical Data to Predict Ischemic Outcomes After PCI.Clinical and translational science · 2026Trial
- Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Sleep Staging From Oximetry and Photoplethysmography-SleepAI.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Sleep disturbances in brain tumors: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Home sleep apnea tests (HSATs) have emerged as alternatives to in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG), but Type IV HSATs often show limited diagnostic performance. This study clinically validates SleepAI, a novel remote digital health system that applies AI algorithms to raw oximetry data for automated sleep staging and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis. SleepAI algorithms were trained on over 10,000 PSG recordings. The system consists of a wearable oximeter connected via Bluetooth to a mobile app transmitting raw data to a cloud-based platform for AI-driven analysis. Clinical validation was conducted in 53 subjects with suspected OSA, who used SleepAI for three nights at home and one night in a sleep centre alongside PSG. SleepAI's apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) estimates and three-class sleep staging (Wake, REM, NREM) were compared to PSG references. For OSA severity classification (non-OSA, mild, moderate, severe), SleepAI achieved an overall accuracy of 89%, with F1-scores of 1.0, 1.0, 0.9, and 0.88, respectively. The three-stage sleep classification achieved a Cohen's kappa of 0.75. Night-to-night AHI variability showed that 37.5% of participants experienced a one-level severity change across nights at home. No significant differences in sleep metrics were found between the first and subsequent nights at home, indicating no sleep disturbance by SleepAI. These findings support the SleepAI system as a promising and scalable alternative to existing Type IV HSATs, with the potential to address key clinical gaps by improving diagnostic accuracy and accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.