Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346945›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2026

Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Sleep Staging From Oximetry and Photoplethysmography-SleepAI.

Shirel Attia, Arie Oksenberg, Jeremy Levy, Angeleene Ang, Revital Shani-Hershkovich, Alissa Adler, Shlomit Katsav, Sharon Haimov, Alexandra Alexandrovich, Riva Tauman and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shirel AttiaThe Faculty of Data and Decision Sciences, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Arie OksenbergFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Jeremy LevyFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Angeleene AngFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Revital Shani-HershkovichThe Institute for Sleep Medecine, Ichilov, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Alissa AdlerThe Institute for Sleep Medecine, Ichilov, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Shlomit KatsavThe Institute for Sleep Medecine, Ichilov, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Sharon HaimovFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Alexandra AlexandrovichFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Riva TaumanThe Institute for Sleep Medecine, Ichilov, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Joachim A BeharFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5956-7034

Funding

Israel Innovation Authority
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home sleep apnea tests (HSATs) have emerged as alternatives to in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG), but Type IV HSATs often show limited diagnostic performance. This study clinically validates SleepAI, a novel remote digital health system that applies AI algorithms to raw oximetry data for automated sleep staging and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis. SleepAI algorithms were trained on over 10,000 PSG recordings. The system consists of a wearable oximeter connected via Bluetooth to a mobile app transmitting raw data to a cloud-based platform for AI-driven analysis. Clinical validation was conducted in 53 subjects with suspected OSA, who used SleepAI for three nights at home and one night in a sleep centre alongside PSG. SleepAI's apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) estimates and three-class sleep staging (Wake, REM, NREM) were compared to PSG references. For OSA severity classification (non-OSA, mild, moderate, severe), SleepAI achieved an overall accuracy of 89%, with F1-scores of 1.0, 1.0, 0.9, and 0.88, respectively. The three-stage sleep classification achieved a Cohen's kappa of 0.75. Night-to-night AHI variability showed that 37.5% of participants experienced a one-level severity change across nights at home. No significant differences in sleep metrics were found between the first and subsequent nights at home, indicating no sleep disturbance by SleepAI. These findings support the SleepAI system as a promising and scalable alternative to existing Type IV HSATs, with the potential to address key clinical gaps by improving diagnostic accuracy and accessibility.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceOximetryPhotoplethysmographySleep Apnea, ObstructiveSleep StagesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographydeep learninghome sleep apnea testsnight‐to‐night variabilityobstructive sleep apneaphotoplethysmographypulse oximetry

Identifiers

PMID40346945
PMCPMC12856116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.