Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346943›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Reimagining Dementia Care: A Complex Intervention Systematic Review on Optimising Social Prescribing (SP) for Carers of People Living With Dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom.

Jessica Marshall, Evie Papavasiliou, Louise Allan, Katherine Bradbury, Chris Fox, Matthew Hawkes, Anne Irvine, Esme Moniz-Cook, Aimee Pick, Marie Polley and 9 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jessica MarshallUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8234-6077
Evie PapavasiliouUniversity of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6504-515X
Louise AllanUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-4901
Katherine BradburyUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5513-7571
Chris FoxUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9480-5704
Matthew HawkesUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-4555
Anne IrvineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Esme Moniz-CookUniversity of West London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7232-4632
Aimee PickNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6361-2297
Marie PolleyMeaningful Measures Ltd, Portishead, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3823-5668
Amy RathboneUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8398-9533
Joanne ReeveUniversity of West London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3184-7955
Dame Louise RobinsonNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0209-2503
George RookUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Euan SadlerUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-224X
Emma WolversonUniversity of West London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5789-7862
Sarah WalkerUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4201-1093
Jane CrossUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-1916
SPLENDID Collaboration

Funding

This study/project is funded by the NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research [NIHR203280].
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCarers of people living with dementia (PLWD) face a range of complex needs, including medical, emotional, social and practical challenges, often exacerbated by social isolation and barriers to accessing support. Social prescribing (SP) addresses these needs by increasing access to non-clinical support and services. However, existing research lacks detailed descriptions of SP interventions for carers of PLWD, with limited understanding of the needs they target, the reasons for participation, their effectiveness and their potential to improve outcomes for carers of PLWD.

methodsA complex intervention systematic review of SP for carers of PLWD was undertaken using iterative logic modelling and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-CI) extension statement and checklist. Six databases and grey literature were searched, supplemented by hand searching reference lists of included studies. Results were screened in a two-step process, followed by data extraction. Gough's Weight of Evidence Framework was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.

resultsFifty-two studies were included. Findings indicated SP for carers of PLWD in the United Kingdom is varied and operates in a largely uncoordinated process involving initiation by diverse stakeholders and institutions across multiple sectors. The classification of SP interventions for carers of PLWD is inconsistent, and participation is often opportunistic. Positive outcomes included improved carer mood, social connections, practical support, quality of life and better PLWD-carer relationships. However, negative outcomes were associated with intervention suitability, emotional impact, relevance and strained PLWD-carer relationships. DISCUSSION: While the evidence suggests SP is a promising intervention for carers of PLWD, its long-term impacts, challenges of tailoring prescriptions to carers' needs and overcoming logistical issues remain. Additionally, further research is required to evaluate long-term impact, investigate specific mechanisms to tailor SP to specific carer needs and explore in greater detail the PLWD-carer relationship and its effects on SP uptake and maintenance. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: A PPI advisory group was involved in the review, including providing insights into review questions, the logic model, findings and results. The group consisted of one person living with dementia and a caregiver.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaSocial PrescribingSocial SupportHumansSocial IsolationUnited Kingdomcarersdementia carepeople living with dementiaprimary caresocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID40346943
PMCPMC12064994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.