ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2026
Did scarless thyroidectomy meet expectations? An evaluation in the aspect of cosmesis: A single-centre prospective study.
Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThyroidectomy is among the most commonly performed endocrine surgeries. Concerns regarding cosmetic outcomes and pain management have led to various surgical innovations. This study compares post-operative patient satisfaction based on cosmesis and expectations between open thyroidectomy (conventional open thyroidectomy [COT]) and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA). PATIENTS AND
methodsFemale patients aged 18-65 years who underwent thyroidectomy for benign conditions were included. Patients were divided into two groups: COT and TOETVA, with 20 patients in each. Post-operative evaluations were conducted on days 15 and 30 using the Vancouver Scar Scale, the modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale and general/visual satisfaction questionnaires.
resultsParticipants rated their surgeries on a scale of 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent) on days 15 and 30. No significant difference in visual scores was observed between groups. However, overall satisfaction scores were higher in the COT group on day 15 (3.5 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9, P = 0.004) and day 30 (3.7 ± 0.5 vs. 3.1 ± 0.8, P = 0.021). Satisfaction scores and incision site oedema showed no significant differences between groups, but hyperaemia was significantly lower in the TOETVA group on day 30. Scar length was also significantly shorter in the TOETVA group.
conclusionHigher satisfaction in the COT group may result from post-operative pain and transient chin numbness in the TOETVA group, alongside short follow-up period. Longer-term studies could better evaluate these differences. The lack of a significant difference in satisfaction suggests that patients' expectations-shaped by the surgical approach they independently choose-may significantly influence their overall satisfaction. While satisfaction scores were similar, TOETVA provides a notable cosmetic advantage due to hidden incisions, making it particularly appealing for patients with aesthetic concerns. This technique represents a significant advancement in achieving patient-centred outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.