ArticleGlobal health promotion2026
The where and the why: sources of information about COVID-19 vaccines among migrants in Australia.
Article in Global health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccess to timely, accurate health-related information can protect migrants' health during public health crises. However, unmet language needs, social alienation and mistrust were among the barriers that migrants faced in accessing official information about COVID-19 and recommended vaccines. This study aimed to explore information-seeking behaviour about COVID-19 vaccines among Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMRO) born migrants in Australia.
methodsWith an explanatory mixed-method approach, we employed an online survey followed by semi-structured interviews. Survey and interviews were advertised through migrants-specific organisations' websites and social media posts, and Facebook advertisements. The survey collected data on socio-demographics, sources of information, preferred communication channels and information-gathering capacity from 300 individuals between September and November 2021. Seventeen adults participated in interviews between December 2021 and February 2022. The qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsThe survey participants' mean age was 41.4 ± 11.8 years and 52% were male. Around 70% reported that the Australian government was among their main sources of information, and 37% preferred receiving information via email or SMS. Around 70% agreed that they can easily access the information they need, feel included in government communications, and can distinguish between fake and good information. Around 60% agreed they could access information in their language, while approximately 50% of respondents indicated they had difficulty understanding vaccine information. Analysis of the interview transcripts revealed that the information sources used depended on their perceived need, their information-gathering capacity, ease of access and trust in sources. Lack of trust in official sources made it more difficult to accept uncertainty. Sources of information favoured included community networks and personal experience.
conclusionTo ensure equitable access to health information, health communications should be tailored to migrants' specific needs, preferences and information-gathering capacity. Such communication should be practised in all aspects of health, not only during a public health crisis, to improve trust in official sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.