ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
A 43-Year-Old Man with a 30-Year History of a Retained Glass Intraocular Foreign Body Presenting with Retinal Detachment.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This report describes the case of a 43-year-old man with a 30-year history of a retained glass intraocular foreign body (IOFB) presenting with retinal detachment. CASE REPORT We describe this case using patient history, ocular examination, and imaging, including anterior segment photographs, fundus photographs, and B-scan ultrasonography. A 43-year-old man presented with retinal detachment in the right eye. Medical history revealed that the patient had suffered an explosive injury to the right eye 30 years ago, for which he underwent surgical repair at the time of the incident. However, a glass IOFB was left in the eye, either due to an oversight during the initial treatment or an intentional decision by the treating physician. On examination, indirect ophthalmoscopy revealed a half-disc-sized retinal hole at the 9 o'clock position in the peripheral retina, along with long-standing atrophic lesions extending from 12 to 2 o'clock. Temporal macular-involving retinal detachment extending from 6 to 11 o'clock was observed. B-scan ultrasonography confirmed the presence of the glass IOFB. The patient subsequently underwent surgical treatment, including pars plana vitrectomy, removal of the IOFB, retinal reattachment, photocoagulation, and silicone oil tamponade. CONCLUSIONS Patients with open globe injuries should be carefully evaluated with the presumption of an IOFB. IOFBs may remain asymptomatic for decades, underscoring the importance of regular follow-up for patients with retained IOFBs. If complications such as retinal detachment occur, they can be managed routinely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.