ArticleSmall methods2025
An AI-Powered Methodology for Atomic-Scale Analysis of Heterogenized Correlated Single-Atom Catalysts.
Article in Small methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Pt Nanoparticle Electrocatalyst Stability on Corrosion Free Carbon Supports Using Identical Location TEM.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- An AI-Powered Methodology for Atomic-Scale Analysis of Heterogenized Correlated Single-Atom Catalysts.Small methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Correlated single-atom catalysts offer transformative potential in catalysis, particularly in the field of electrocatalysis, with a focus on oxygen evolution reactions. Advanced characterization is critical to understanding their atomic-scale properties when techniques usually used in molecular science (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Infrared spectroscopy (IR), or Mass Spectrometry (MS)) cannot be applied after dispersing them on a carrier material. Here, a methodology that combines machine learning and mathematical optimization techniques to detect and quantify metal-metal interactions within heterobinuclear Au(III)-Pd(II) macrocyclic complexes on atomically resolved high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images is introduced. Both supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods are evaluated, with the U-net architecture demonstrating superior performance in distinguishing the two involved chemical species. Mathematical optimization models further enhance the reliability of metal pair identification by providing precise distance metrics for the pairs. This methodology allows for the study of both the dynamics and bond interaction of heterobinuclear Au(III)-Pd(II) complexes. Notably, the analysis of time series of images reveals that most metal pairs remained stable under the high-energy electron beam irradiation conditions. Likewise, the Au-Pd distance within the pairs remains unchanged, indicating a robust interaction of the two metals with the ligand even after being deposited on the amorphous carbon substrate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.