Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346751›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical nursing2026

Predictive Performance of Device-Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale to Evaluating Pressure Injuries Risk in the Neonates. An Observational Multicenter Study.

Biagio Nicolosi, Elisa Neri, Leonardo Fioravanti, Silvia Leoncini, Claudio De Felice, Pablo Garcìa-Molina, Alessandra Mugnaini

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Biagio NicolosiWound and Burn Center, Health Profession Department, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-6665-1638
Elisa NeriNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Senese University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
Leonardo FioravantiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-2379-6286
Silvia LeonciniU.O.S.A. Programmazione e Ricerca Clinica, Senese University Hospital, Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-1207
Claudio De FeliceU.O.S.A. Programmazione e Ricerca Clinica, Senese University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
Pablo Garcìa-MolinaNursing Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Alessandra MugnainiNursing and Midwifery Department, Senese University Hospital, Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the validity of a modified Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment scale (Dev-NSARS) for neonatal pressure injuries (PIs) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and neonatal sub-intensive care unit (NICU-Sub) environment.

backgroundMedical devices are the leading cause of pressure injuries (PIs) in neonates, a key cause of morbidity in neonatology, significantly impacting the length of stay (LOS) and public hospital resources.

methodsThe Dev-NSRAS scale, considering the presence of medical devices, was tested on a national multicenter prospective study on newborns. The discrimination power of the Dev-NSRAS scale was compared to that of the more commonly used Glamorgan scale.

resultsNine newborns (6.6%) developed PIs, with a total of 16 injuries, 75% (12 out of 16) of which were device related. Newborns with postconceptional age ≤ 30.8 weeks were at higher risk of developing PIs. First 24-h total Dev-NSRAS scores were compared with first 24-h Glamorgan scores, to obtain and compare respective sensitivity and specificity. During the first 24 h from admission, a very good discriminative performance was evidenced for Dev-NSRAS ≤ 11 (AUC 0.921, 95% CI: 0.899-0.940, p < 0.0001; 81.6% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity) as compared to a moderate discriminative performance shown by a Glamorgan score > 28 (AUC 0.752, 95% CI: 0.634-0.660, p < 0.0001; 92.1% sensitivity and 65.5% specificity).

conclusionsEarly application (i.e., in the first day from hospital admission) of Dev-NSRAS by the nursing personnel shows excellent accuracy in predicting the risk of developing PUs in newborns admitted to NICU and NICU-Sub, as compared to the Glamorgan scale. REPORTING

methodThe STROBE statement for cohort observational studies was used as the reference reporting method. IMPACT: The study addressed the lack of a risk assessment scale for pressure injuries in neonates. Development and testing of a scale that demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in the early prediction of pressure injury risk in neonates within the first 24 h. The research will have an impact in NICUs and NICU-Sub units, enabling nurses to plan personalised care to prevent pressure injuries in neonates, thereby reducing the length of hospital stays and overall healthcare costs. CONTRIBUTION: Introduce a validated scale for improving neonatal pressure injury prevention worldwide. Enhance early detection tools, reduce hospital stays and global costs. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Paediatric Tuscany Region Ethical Committee (date: 18 January 2021; protocol code 18/2021).

Indexed as

Pressure UlcerFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleProspective StudiesRisk Assessmentmedical device related pressure injuryneonatal intensive carepressure injuryrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40346751
PMCPMC12667003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.