ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Thirty-day mortality risk prediction for geriatric patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery in the surgical intensive care unit.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translational Potential and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support for Adults in Intensive Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prediction of mortality for elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgeries is a vital research area, as accurate risk assessment can help surgeons make better clinical decisions during the perioperative period. This study aims to build a mortality risk prediction model for surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients aged 65 and older undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
methodsData was obtained from 1960 patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery from the medical information mart for intensive care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. The least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) regularization algorithm and the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) for feature importance evaluation were used to screen important predictors. Five predictive models were established: categorical boosting (CatBoost), logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). External validation was performed utilizing data from 153 patients in the MIMIC-III database. Finally, shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was utilized for a personalized analysis of the models.
resultsAmong the five predictive models developed in this study, the CatBoost model demonstrated superior overall performance in both the test data set (AUC = 0.96, F1 = 0.90) and the external validation data set (AUC = 0.98, F1 = 0.91). The decision curve analysis showed that the model offers a beneficial net benefit. The CatBoost model showed significant enhancements in classification accuracy when compared to the conventional revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) score. SHAP analysis revealed that anion gap, age, prothrombin time (PT), and weight were the four key variables influencing the predictive performance of the CatBoost model.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of machine learning methods for early prediction of outcomes in critically ill elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. A web-based application was developed, which could serve as an effective tool for clinicians in their risk assessment and clinical decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.