ArticleBMC medical education2025
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Chinese anesthesiologists toward difficult airways.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pre-anesthetic evaluation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in China: a national web-based questionnaire survey.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifficult airways (i.e., when a healthcare provider with skills in airway management encounters difficulties when using recognized techniques) require proper training (or supervision), experience, risk assessment, and clinical judgment, but the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of Chinese anesthesiologists toward difficult airways is poorly known. This study aimed to remedy that problem.
methodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled Chinese anesthesiologists from September 1, 2023, to November 30, 2023. The KAP toward difficult airways was assessed using a questionnaire (Cronbach's α = 0.705). Scores ≥ 85% indicated good/positive/proactive knowledge/attitudes/practice, 50-75% were moderate, and < 50% were poor. The factors associated with practice were identified by multivariable logistic regression.
resultsA total of 992 questionnaires were included. The participants were 39.89 ± 8.46 years, 52.72% were male, 79.13% were working in tertiary hospitals, and 19.96% had 6-10 years of experience in anesthesia. The mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 18.09 ± 2.46 (69.58% of the maximum), 32.22 ± 2.77 (92.06% of the maximum), and 63.80 ± 5.54 (85.07% of the maximum), respectively. 97.18% of anesthesiologists reported that they frequently assess all patients for the risk of difficult airway and aspiration prior to anesthesia administration or airway management. Notably, however, 30.14% of doctors indicated that they may not confirm the availability of difficult airway equipment in the operating room if the patient has not been evaluated as having a difficult airway. Furthermore, only 41.93% of anesthesiologists reported being able to successfully use awake fiberoptic intubation when managing a difficult airway on a frequent basis. The high attitude scores (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.234, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.164-1.307, P < 0.001), master's degree or above (OR = 2.262, 95%CI: 1.539-3.323, P < 0.001), and participated in training on difficult airway assessment and management in the past 6 months (OR = 1.943, 95%CI: 1.388-2.720, P < 0.001) were more likely to achieve higher practical scores. After adjustment, the SEM showed that knowledge directly influenced attitude (β = 0.338, P = 0.011) but not practice (P = 0.637); attitude directly influenced practice (β = 0.584, P = 0.003).
conclusionAnesthesiologists in China have favorable KAP toward difficult airways. Nonetheless, certain practices require enhancement. Since knowledge is associated with attitude and attitude with practice, educational and motivational activities should be designed to improve practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.