Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346589›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical science2025

Accelerating antibody discovery and optimization with high-throughput experimentation and machine learning.

Ryo Matsunaga, Kouhei Tsumoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryo MatsunagaDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-9176
Kouhei TsumotoDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan. tsumoto@bioeng.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7643-5164

Funding

ACT-X JPMJAX222IJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP223fa627001Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP223fa727002Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JPMXP1122714694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of high-throughput experimentation and machine learning is transforming data-driven antibody engineering, revolutionizing the discovery and optimization of antibody therapeutics. These approaches employ extensive datasets comprising antibody sequences, structures, and functional properties to train predictive models that enable rational design. This review highlights the significant advancements in data acquisition and feature extraction, emphasizing the necessity of capturing both sequence and structural information. We illustrate how machine learning models, including protein language models, are used not only to enhance affinity but also to optimize other crucial therapeutic properties, such as specificity, stability, viscosity, and manufacturability. Furthermore, we provide practical examples and case studies to demonstrate how the synergy between experimental and computational approaches accelerates antibody engineering. Finally, this review discusses the remaining challenges in fully realizing the potential of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered antibody discovery pipelines to expedite therapeutic development.

Indexed as

AntibodiesDrug DiscoveryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMachine LearningHumansProtein EngineeringAntibodiesAntibody designAntibody therapeuticsComputational antibody engineeringData-driven designMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40346589
PMCPMC12063268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.